Rotten tomatoes is right 90% of the time. If a film gets 70% it will typically illicit “yeah not bad, pretty good” if it gets 90-100% it will typically get a “wow that was incredible” and below 70% usually is a waste of time or a comedy to which RT is useless in judging.
In this way,What does a 95% rating on Rotten Tomatoes mean?
The reason there’s a problem is that many people have a fundamental misunderstanding of what that score means. If a movie has a 95%, it is not the equivalent to IGN giving something a 9.5/10. It means that 95% of critics gave the movie a recommendation.
Also know,Why are Rotten Tomatoes scores taken so seriously?
In light of threads like The downfall of M. Night Shyamalan (A graphical representation), and the fact that Rotten Tomatoes scores are so often cited as evidence of a film’s merit, I am constantly amazed that anyone takes this website seriously. Aggregating critic scores is a fine idea.
Consequently,Why do we use Rotten Tomatoes for movie reviews?
Several film articles on Wikipedia (which certainly has its shortcomings but, in its pursuit of actual information rather than consensus, has far greater credibility than RT) reference Rotten Tomatoes in order to provide evidence of a film’s reception, whether or not that film was released in the time period that Rotten Tomatoes actually existed.
What kind of plants are evil to eat?
Cherry, Plum, Beef, Sundried, Green, Organic or home grown; all TOMATOES ARE EVIL. The story does not end here….. tomatoes are evil .com are pleased to finally reveal the truth. Nightshade plants such as tomatoes, potatoes, aubergines, chili peppers and tobacco disagree with many people.